As a longtime student of human nature, I shouldn't be surprised by anything, I suppose.
I should sort of expect that people with power and/or access to large sums of public money would have few qualms about stealing as much as they could get away with.
Turns out that's not the way things work just in Texas alone.
And the scofflaws are not merely limited to elected officials and their political appointees.
Out there in Chattanooga, Tenn., the library system executive director, a former Dallasite -- which may help explain things -- has apparently been living high on the hog with money not her own.
Joy Lukachick Smith of the Chattanooga Times Free Press reported Sunday that Corinne Hill and two assistants went on at least 25 trips in the last two fiscal years, trips that cost taxpayers about $40,000. They went to places like Seattle, Las Vegas, Singapore and Denmark.
The two assistants have been dealt with, and now Hill is trying to defend herself.
I can't see how she can possibly justify spending well over what her own state allows to be spent on travel, which would have been generous enough.
But I have learned that something happens to people when they feel like no one is watching.
Niney percent of Americans polled by Harris recently said they feel it is important that a library be a valuable educational resource.
More than 70 percent think libraries are pillars of their communities.
Yet only 64 percent of adults have a library card, which is down from 68 percent six years go.
I agree with Library Journal's Gary Price, who writes that if people really knew what libraries offer today they'd be more inclined to have a card than ever before.
He's talking mainly about web-based resources, and, boy, do libraries have those. Just take a look at what we have for people with a card. In our TexShare Databases alone you can do genealogy research, prepare a resume, find entertainment and so much more. There are hundreds of courses offered at Universal Classes. E-books can be downloaded at Overdrive. And that's all just for starters. In the space above this blog on the home page of our site, press "go" and you can see what's out there.
I can see why they banned "Lolita."
And "Little Black Sambo."
And "Peyton Place."
But "A Light in the Attic?"
How many kids have grown up having read Shel Silverstein's classic work of poetry? Millions? I dunno.
How many of them were turned into raging killers because "A Light in the Attic" was some kind of gateway read?
This is Banned Books Week across America, time to recognize that school boards and state officials are still banning books here and there.
I'm sure they all believe they are preserving innocence, protecting their children. And at some extreme ends of the spectrum they probably are.
But in this day and age I'm much more concerned about every other medium out there that ought to be carefully scrutinized than I am worried about books, especially children's books.
For example, plug the word "porn" into Google and see what you get. That's pretty scary. Much scarier than anything you'd find in most libraries and bookstores.
Read slow, learn more and feel more relaxed.
That's a formula explored in a Wall Street Journal article this past week. Jeanne Whalen has rounded up data from a number of studies for her piece, which shows that without a doubt if you slow down when you read you will be much better off for it.
But, as she also notes, today that just isn't happening. In fact, the opposite is the case. People want to zip through everything they read (and do, for that matter). They tend to treat literature like they do e-mail -- something to get through as quickly as possible.
Now, here and there around the globe people are actually coming together to s-l-o-w down their reading and to thus up their enjoyment of the habit.
I recommend her three tips for your consideration:
+ Go to a place without distractions. Turn off the phone and computer.
+ Take notes here and there. That helps you have a dialog with the author.
+ Treat reading like exercise, something you take time for.
Page 28 of 65