Text Size
English Spanish

Librarian Blog

We have winners!

Our second annual Wimberley Film Festival, conducted Saturday evening, was a smashing success. A total of 11 movies were entered for viewing and judging.

The following were our winners. Congratulations to all of them.

Best Movie, Youth Division: "Stayin 'Alive'" produced by Coleson, Ian and Sage Summers and directed by Coleson, Ian and Sage Summers.

Best Movie, Adult Division: "Dreamcatcher" produced and directed by Tess Hasbrouck.

Best Actress, Youth Division: Genivieve Hodge in "Mischief and Mayhem"

Best Actress, Adult Division: Dorothy Anderson in "Dreamcatcher."

Best Actor: Erik Coomer in "Gold"

Most Artistic Movie: "End of Everything" produced by Maverick Shaw

Best Foreign Film: "Call Me James" directed by Amy Bryson

Best Director: Isabelle Hodge

Small Bambi Awards went to the following:

Hercules, the cat, for best performance by a cat in "Stayin 'Alive.'"

Nori Larsn for Best Technical Support.

Joe Hasbrouk for Best Supporting Actor in "Dreamcatcher."

The right to be forgotten

In Europe, citizens have the right to require Google and other search engines to remove old news or information about them after the passage of a certain period of time.

No such right exists in the United States as a matter of law.

So, the American Library Association and others have been asking, in a variety of forums, whether this country should.

The central notion here is that people have a right to bury their baggage after a reasonable length of time. If you, for example, were arrested for stealing chickens when you were 17 and an item appeared in the newspaper or in an electronic venue, shouldn't you be able to put that episode behind you when you decided to run for office as a 54-year-old? Doesn't simple fairness dictate that you do have such a right even if it's not in law?

Yes, it should.

And, as a practical matter, the principle is recognized in the Unite States in the common law developed around the issue of privacy. The courts have found that you can win an invasion of privacy case under civil law if a sin from long ago makes it back into print or online 20 or 30 years after the fact.

In the newspapers I edited, I warned all my reporters and copy editors not to go back in the files and dredge up ancient news about individuals who were making news again.


Penn and El Chapo

As a journalist, Sean Penn is a great actor.

Penn, you know, has written up an interview for publication in Rolling Stone magazine.

Like any great journalist, he got himself an exclusive -- this one happens to have been with El Chapo, the drug kingpin in Mexico just arrested by the Mexican marines.

Penn apparently met the drug lord in some remote part of Mexico and interviewed him in person and then pursued other topics online.

I have not read the Rolling Stone piece.

But, thanks to "60 Minutes" I now have enough information to know this was not a work of true journalism. See, Sean Penn let El Chapo read his story and approve of it BEFORE it was published. Journalists do not do that.

So, Sean Penn is a PR shil for a drug king. That's it, pure and simple.

It's getting ugly out there

I've only just stumbled upon a raging controversy over another children's book.

The book was published by Scholastic, which has now pulled the plug on the book.

The title is A Birthday Cake for George Washington. The issue is this: the author and artist depict the cooks who prepare the cake as happy black folks, dancing and smiling as they fix the boss's favorite dessert. The contention from those who are up in arms about the book seems to be that not enough emphasis was given to the fact these people are enslaved. The author says that even so they could have been happy.

Whoa! I sure don't want to get involved in that. Just wanted to pass the fact there's a dispute along.

Check it out.


Shooting ourselves in the feet

I was reading through some old copies of Science News, the magazine, the other day and found myself reading a column by the editor at the time Eva Emerson.

The item was about the government shutdown of 2013 and the message it sent to young people wanting a career in research.

Her reference was a longer article in the same issue, dated Nov. 30, 2013, that spread out all the facts about how the U.S. government has steadily reduced funding for scientific research and development over time.

I'd been hearing about that for years, so it was nothing new.

I decided to Google U.S. government R&D funding and found that nothing's changed in the slope of the downward-tending curve of government support for scientific research. It's down, down, down.

Meanwhile, isn't it becoming more and more obvious that the path to technological and scientific superiority, upon which our nation's reputation largely rests, is through, in part, government-funded research?

Somebody needs to talk sense this election season about how to restore and rebuild funding levels for science, but also for welfare and also for job training and programs to boost people out of poverty. Talking cuts may be popular, but cutting for the sake of cutting will not pay off for our children and their children.

Our website is protected by DMC Firewall!