With the holidays looming right before us, it is time for you and your friends to start working on that home movie for entry in the first Wimberley Film Festival and competition.
The library is sponsoring this event, which won't happen if we don't get some entries.
Movies should be 5 to 7 minutes in length, including credits, and should be submitted to us on a DVD.
I've heard there's some interest in the home-school community here, but no one has come around to get a copy of the rules.
Deadline is 5 p.m. Dec. 31.
Lights! Camera! Action!
Just days before Christmas last year, my bank canceled my credit card.
Seems that my personal data had been stolen in the monumental Target hack.
A few weeks ago, the bank canceled my credit card again. This time, I was somehow involved in the Home Depot hack.
I never got an apology from Target. And I'm still waiting for one from Home Depot, but I'm sure not holding my breath.
So, I am very much on board with the movement to hold corporate boards of directors responsible for the safety of their customers' information.
I read about it recently online. My favorite quote is from John Kindervag, security analyst at Forrester: "We live in the post-Target era. There's a moral obligation to consider firing an executive team because of a data breach. It's a huge business failure."
Amen to that.
Meanwhile, I'm no longer shopping at Target or Home Depot. Maybe if all their customers took seriously this business of being hacked, we'd get directors attention.
Humans have long been intrigued with robots, most recently as aerial drones but also as substitutes in other fields -- such as writing.
A few years ago, some programmers came up with a robot that they said could write simple sports stories. Give the computer a score and a simple play-by-play, and off it would go sprinting toward making an early deadline.
Most of the work in that direction did not get very far, or had not gotten very far when I left journalism about four years ago. (One crazy prediction: They will never replace Kirk Bohls.)
This past weekend Lisa Granshaw wrote in the Daily Dot online about robots that are working on fiction. One at Georgia Institute of Technology takes plot and action and comes up with something similar to a story line, although it's pretty darn rudimentary and not very interesting and also clunky sounding.
Two other robots she discusses toss out story ideas. To my ear, they sounded like simple machines that matched words from Column A to phrases from Columns B and C and threw those out for us to think about. Not especially ingenious.
If these are the latest and greatest forays into replacing human writers, there is still a long, long way to go.
And, no -- a robot did not write this blog.
Libraries around the country are doing some incredible things far beyond the world of books and reading.
The Colorado Springs Gazette reported this week on the opening of a Center for Public Media at the Pikes Peak Library called Library 21c.
That's a boring name for an exciting new venture.
The center staff hopes to help future filmmakers, video producers, musicians and others produce their own high-quality videos.
The study has video cameras, lights and editing programs.
The library will offer courses on studio sound, directing, producing and editing. And anyone who wants to use the lab will have to take a 101-type course to be able to reserve it.
Now, that's pretty darn cool, when you think about how much it would cost a college student, say, to produce his or her own video.
This is cutting-edge use of technology.
Other libraries are doing less extravagant things for their maker communities. And we have plans here to put together a maker space. If you have ideas about what you'd like to see, let us know.
Last weekend I finished all the requirements to get a certificate of accomplishment for completing a massive online only course called "How Things Work" taught by Dr. Lou Bloomfield at The University of Virginia.
It was the first MOOC I have actually gotten all the way through. I started one on guitar basics a year ago, and it was just too basic. I got so bored, I stopped worrying with it.
Bloomfield's course was excellent. And it was challenging. I await my final grade, which should be in the range of 80-85. I'll be happy with that.
Having said all that, I can see why university officials are re-thinking the usefulness of MOOCs in their curricula. The American-Statesman has an article about that in today's edition.
The University of Texas and others have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars developing MOOCs, and they aren't sure whether they are worth their while in rigorous academic terms.
I think they are a nice supplement, personally. And they also help introduce a particular topic or professor.
I came away from "How Things Work" with a good feel for the University of Virginia and a real affection for Dr. Bloomfield. I'm not sure how that goodwill translates.
Page 20 of 60